| CREATIVE CAPABILITIES |
| 360º roll |
⚠️ Limited (~3 spins) |
⚠️ Limited (~3 spins) |
⚠️ Limited (~3 spins) |
✅ Infinite |
|
Trinity 1, 2, and Omega can only rotate ~3 times; Cyclo allows infinite rotation thanks to the slipring.
|
| Upside-down / Dutch angle shots |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
|
All systems support extreme angles. Cyclo adjusts faster thanks to onboard computer.
|
| Low ↔ high move without cut (head-to-toe) |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
|
All systems allow smooth vertical moves, but Cyclo provides more precision and control.
|
| Extreme low / high shots |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
|
All stabilizers can reach extreme heights and low positions.
|
| VERSATILITY ON SET |
| Onboard computer / control |
❌ |
✅ |
❌ |
✅ Modern, integrated |
|
Cyclo and Trinity 2 have onboard computers for easier control; Trinity 1 and Omega require external devices.
|
| Real-time parameter adjustment (no lag) |
❌ |
⚠️ Partial |
❌ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo allows instant parameter tweaks; Trinity 2 allows partial adjustment depending on setup; Trinity 1 & Omega have no live adjustment.
|
| Roll control via any SBUS device |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
|
Only Cyclo can be controlled via any SBUS device, giving full remote flexibility.
|
| Mountable on dolly, crane, vehicle |
⚠️ Limited |
⚠️ Limited |
✅ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo and Omega mount easily on dolly, crane, or vehicle. Trinity 1 & 2 can be mounted with the same restrictions (may require hacks or third-party adapters).
|
| RELIABILITY & LOGISTICS |
| Current-generation technology (2025) |
❌ |
✅ |
⚠️ Outdated |
✅ |
|
Cyclo and Trinity 2 are up-to-date for 2025. Trinity 1 is outdated, Omega technology is older.
|
| Low electronic failure risk (optimized HW/SW) |
❌ |
⚠️ Partial |
❌ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo is optimized for reliability. Trinity 2 partially benefits from improved hardware/software. Trinity 1 & Omega: higher failure risk.
|
| Fast setup & balancing |
❌ |
⚠️ Improved |
✅ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo balances very quickly. Trinity 2 is faster than Trinity 1 but still slower. Omega is similar to Cyclo in speed.
|
| Easy transport & simple maintenance |
❌ |
❌ |
❓ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo is compact and easy to maintain. Omega is similar in size but maintenance requirements are unclear. Trinity 1 & 2 are bulkier, harder to transport.
|
| COST & EFFICIENCY |
| On-set efficiency (less downtime) |
❌ |
⚠️ Partial |
❌ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo minimizes downtime with fast operation. Trinity 2 may help partially. Trinity 1 & Omega are slower.
|
| Competitive cost/performance ratio |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
|
Cyclo offers a strong cost-to-performance ratio. Trinity 1, 2, and Omega are either more expensive or less flexible.
|
